Ripple Files Opposition to SEC’s Motion to Certify Interlocutory Appeal of XRP Ruling

Legal scales with Ripple logo on one side and SEC logo on the other.


Ripple Labs Inc., the blockchain firm behind the cryptocurrency XRP, has filed an opposition to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s motion to certify an interlocutory appeal concerning a previous court ruling on XRP’s status as a security.

Key Points

  • Legal Background: The SEC has been engaged in a legal battle with Ripple over whether XRP constitutes a security under U.S. law.
  • Court Ruling: A court had earlier made a ruling favorable to Ripple, which the SEC is now attempting to appeal through an interlocutory process.
  • Ripple’s Opposition: Ripple has filed an opposition to the SEC’s motion, arguing that the commission has not met the standard requirements to certify an interlocutory appeal.
  • Implications for XRP: The ongoing legal case has significant implications for the trading and regulatory status of XRP, one of the largest cryptocurrencies by market capitalization.

Legal Complexity

  • Interlocutory Appeal: An interlocutory appeal allows a party to appeal a court ruling before the case has been fully resolved.
  • Criteria for Appeal: Ripple argues that the SEC has failed to meet the specific criteria required to initiate an interlocutory appeal, including showing substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal may materially advance the termination of the litigation.


  • Market Impact: The outcome of the legal battle could have a considerable effect on the XRP market and potentially the wider cryptocurrency industry.
  • Regulatory Clarity: A final decision on the matter would provide much-needed clarity on how cryptocurrencies like XRP are to be regulated in the U.S.
  • Timeline: It is yet unclear how long the legal proceedings will take, especially with the possibility of an appeal.


  1. What is an Interlocutory Appeal?
    It is a type of appeal that occurs before the full case has been resolved, usually on a specific issue that could have a significant impact on the outcome of the case.
  2. Why has Ripple opposed the SEC’s motion?
    Ripple argues that the SEC has not met the requirements for an interlocutory appeal, suggesting that the appeal could be an attempt to delay proceedings.
  3. What’s at stake for XRP?
    The final decision on whether or not XRP is a security will have a significant impact on its trading and regulatory status.

full story:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *